week 5. reflection on AI-generated content and intellectual property

Today, I read Chesterman (2025). I believe that AI-generated content should be copyright-free or freely allowed for commercial use as long as the source is credited. In the past, creating high-quality media like art, video, or music required professional skills, forcing regular people to either pay high prices or spend hours searching for rare copyright-free options. Generative AI changed this by allowing anyone to easily create media, which  improves the quality of information; for instance, writers who used to rely only on text can now use AI images to explain their ideas much better. While technical issues like model poisoning or training data ethics are valid concerns, they should be treated as separate problems for AI companies. Restricting commercial use only blocks highly motivated creators who want to put effort into making great content for a larger audience. Ultimately, allowing commercial use is a win-win, as it helps creators share more engaging work while promoting AI companies' tools to the public.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2. book chapter and my reflection

Week1 reflection - Is Web 4.0-supported information rosy?

week4. Digital badge app design draft for a lazy grad student