week 4. Reflection on Crowdsourcing: algorithms for minors
This week, I read Tyrrell and Shalavin’s (2022) paper about crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing is based on the idea of 'collective intelligence.' It suggests that when a group of people works together, they can make smarter decisions than one genius. In this era with diverse perspectives, this sounds like a fair way to listen to everyone's thoughts. However, this paper also addresses the digital literacy-driven disparity. I began to see a different side: the risk of repeating dominant structures. It is true that crowdsourcing is more open than traditional top-down methods. It gives a space for minority voices. But in reality, most platforms still favor the thoughts of the majority. When a system uses voting or comments to decide what is "best," the most popular opinions appear on the first screen, based on the innate algorithms. People then naturally assume that these top-ranked posts are the "right" ones. I am sure I am not the only one who feels tired of thi...